| 0 | Saint Louis | 76.3% | AQ | strong/solid SOS || good overall record || no bad losses || solid NET || solid non-con || solid conf record || good away-from-home wpct || 2.0 quality wins in non-con(1.0 q1 wins and 1.0 q2 wins) || 3.0 quality wins in conf play(1.0 q1 wins and 2.0 q2 wins) || doesn't have non-d1 loss | only 2.0 q1 wins |
| 1 | Wright State | 0% | AQ | this team can not possibly get an AL | this team can not possibly get an AL |
| 2 | Utah State | 86.8% | AQ | strong/solid SOS || 3.0 q1 wins || good overall record || solid NET || solid non-con || solid conf record || good away-from-home wpct || 2.0 quality wins in non-con(1.0 q1 wins and 1.0 q2 wins) || 6.0 quality wins in conf play(2.0 q1 wins and 4.0 q2 wins) || doesn't have non-d1 loss | 1.0 q3 losses |
| 3 | Hawaii | 0% | AQ | this team can not possibly get an AL | this team can not possibly get an AL |
| 4 | Florida | 100% | AQ | strong/solid SOS || 6.0 q1 wins || has 6.0 q1a wins || good overall record || no bad losses || solid NET || solid non-con || solid conf record || good away-from-home wpct || 3.0 quality wins in non-con(1.0 q1 wins and 2.0 q2 wins) || 8.0 quality wins in conf play(5.0 q1 wins and 3.0 q2 wins) || doesn't have non-d1 loss | |
| 5 | Stephen F. Austin | 0% | AQ | this team can not possibly get an AL | this team can not possibly get an AL |
| 6 | Arizona | 100% | AQ | strong/solid SOS || 8.0 q1 wins || has 8.0 q1a wins || good overall record || no bad losses || solid NET || solid non-con || solid conf record || good away-from-home wpct || 6.0 quality wins in non-con(5.0 q1 wins and 1.0 q2 wins) || 8.0 quality wins in conf play(3.0 q1 wins and 5.0 q2 wins) || doesn't have non-d1 loss | |
| 7 | Gonzaga | 94% | AQ | strong/solid SOS || 4.0 q1 wins || has 4.0 q1a wins || good overall record || solid NET || solid non-con || solid conf record || good away-from-home wpct || 5.0 quality wins in non-con(3.0 q1 wins and 2.0 q2 wins) || 4.0 quality wins in conf play(1.0 q1 wins and 3.0 q2 wins) || doesn't have non-d1 loss | 1.0 q3 losses |
| 8 | Vermont | 0% | AQ | this team can not possibly get an AL | this team can not possibly get an AL |
| 9 | Bethune-Cookman | 0% | AQ | this team can not possibly get an AL | this team can not possibly get an AL |
| 10 | East Tennessee State | 0% | AQ | this team can not possibly get an AL | this team can not possibly get an AL |
| 11 | Marist | 0% | AQ | this team can not possibly get an AL | this team can not possibly get an AL |
| 12 | Austin Peay | 0% | AQ | this team can not possibly get an AL | this team can not possibly get an AL |
| 13 | Troy | 0% | AQ | this team can not possibly get an AL | this team can not possibly get an AL |
| 14 | Howard | 0% | AQ | this team can not possibly get an AL | this team can not possibly get an AL |
| 15 | Tennessee-Martin | 0% | AQ | this team can not possibly get an AL | this team can not possibly get an AL |
| 16 | High Point | 0% | AQ | this team can not possibly get an AL | this team can not possibly get an AL |
| 17 | Duke | 100% | AQ | strong/solid SOS || 10.0 q1 wins || has 10.0 q1a wins || good overall record || no bad losses || solid NET || solid non-con || solid conf record || good away-from-home wpct || 5.0 quality wins in non-con(5.0 q1 wins and 0.0 q2 wins) || 8.0 quality wins in conf play(5.0 q1 wins and 3.0 q2 wins) || doesn't have non-d1 loss | |
| 18 | Liberty | 0% | AQ | this team can not possibly get an AL | this team can not possibly get an AL |
| 19 | St. Thomas | 0% | AQ | this team can not possibly get an AL | this team can not possibly get an AL |
| 20 | Long Island University | 0% | AQ | this team can not possibly get an AL | this team can not possibly get an AL |
| 21 | Connecticut | 100% | AQ | strong/solid SOS || 5.0 q1 wins || has 5.0 q1a wins || good overall record || no bad losses || solid NET || solid non-con || solid conf record || good away-from-home wpct || 5.0 quality wins in non-con(4.0 q1 wins and 1.0 q2 wins) || 8.0 quality wins in conf play(1.0 q1 wins and 7.0 q2 wins) || doesn't have non-d1 loss | |
| 22 | Montana State | 0% | AQ | this team can not possibly get an AL | this team can not possibly get an AL |
| 23 | Hofstra | 0% | AQ | this team can not possibly get an AL | this team can not possibly get an AL |
| 24 | Akron | 0% | AQ | this team can not possibly get an AL | this team can not possibly get an AL |
| 25 | Tulsa | 3.6% | AQ | strong/solid SOS || good overall record || solid NET || solid non-con || solid conf record || good away-from-home wpct || 1.0 quality wins in non-con(0.0 q1 wins and 1.0 q2 wins) || 2.0 quality wins in conf play(0.0 q1 wins and 2.0 q2 wins) || doesn't have non-d1 loss | no quad 1 wins || 1.0 q3 losses |
| 26 | Utah Valley | 0% | AQ | this team can not possibly get an AL | this team can not possibly get an AL |
| 27 | Michigan | 100% | AQ | strong/solid SOS || 8.0 q1 wins || has 8.0 q1a wins || good overall record || no bad losses || solid NET || solid non-con || solid conf record || good away-from-home wpct || 7.0 quality wins in non-con(4.0 q1 wins and 3.0 q2 wins) || 9.0 quality wins in conf play(4.0 q1 wins and 5.0 q2 wins) || doesn't have non-d1 loss | |
| 28 | Yale |